Stephanie Grisham, a former aide to Melania Trump, has shed light on how the former first lady is attentively following the developments in the hush money lawsuit involving her husband, Donald Trump. The lawsuit revolves around alleged payments made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels prior to the 2016 presidential election, which were reportedly concealed through the manipulation of corporate paperwork, according to Huff Post.
Grisham revealed to Erin Burnett of CNN that Melania Trump is particularly interested in the coverage of this trial, especially following revelations about David Pecker, the former publisher of the National Enquirer, who admitted to using a secret email for sensitive communications.
According to Grisham, who has held roles as chief of staff and press secretary to Melania Trump, the former first lady is keen on concrete proof and is closely monitoring the unfolding events. Grisham emphasized Melania’s focus on evidence, suggesting that any new, damaging information could significantly capture her attention, especially if it concerns allegations she was previously unaware of due to her husband’s denials.
In her discussions with Burnett, Grisham highlighted how Melania values indisputable evidence, and how revelations from Pecker’s emails could impact her understanding and reaction to the case. This emphasis on verified facts has been a consistent trait for Melania, manifesting even amidst ongoing denials from Donald Trump about his involvement with Daniels.
Amidst speculations and rumors, some commentators suggested that Melania might be privately criticizing the trial. However, Grisham dispelled these rumors, stating that Melania is forthright and would openly express her views if she found the proceedings disgraceful. According to Grisham, “Melania Trump absolutely does what she wants to do. If she felt this was a disgrace, she would say something.”
Concurrently, Melania has been promoting a new jewelry line named “Love & Gratitude,” priced at $245. While some have speculated about the potential use of proceeds from this venture, including possibly funding Donald Trump’s legal defense, Grisham dismissed such theories, suggesting the project was driven by personal rather than legal motivations.
Moreover, Grisham also commented on the timing of the jewelry line’s launch, advising that Melania could consider using the proceeds for charitable donations to avoid any negative perceptions associated with her husband’s ongoing legal issues. This strategy, Grisham hinted, would help Melania maintain a positive public image during a turbulent period.
Overall, the insights from Grisham reveal a picture of Melania Trump as an individual deeply invested in the factual accuracy of public claims and legal proceedings, especially those directly impacting her family. Her approach to the unfolding legal drama and her business initiatives suggests a complex balancing act of personal interests and public perception.
