Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have come under sharp criticism once again—this time from royal commentator Lee Cohen, who argues that the couple’s decisions reflect poor judgment and a lack of reliable guidance. In a recent piece for GB News, Cohen takes aim at the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s post-royal behavior, questioning the values and instincts that now shape their public image.
Cohen asserts that the couple’s commercial ventures and frequent interviews are not rooted in strategic thinking but in impulsive decision-making. “His and Meghan’s poor judgment and instincts reveal a couple out of their depth and devoid of sound counsel,” he writes.
He goes on to claim that Harry, in particular, has become vulnerable due to this dynamic, adding, “it’s left Harry vulnerable and subject to his and his wife’s own disastrous instincts.” According to Cohen, the pair’s actions have not only distanced them from the Royal Family but also raised serious questions about their continued use of royal titles.
“How long will Harry and his wife be allowed to enjoy titles that they constantly disgrace?” he asks, citing what he views as repeated contradictions between their behavior and the values traditionally upheld by the monarchy. One example that Cohen highlights is Harry’s appearance at an eco-travel panel in Shanghai, despite reportedly arriving via private jet after a flight spanning over 13 hours.
This, he argues, undermines the credibility of the Duke’s public stance on environmental issues. “It proves he cannot thrive without the palace’s wisdom and guidance,” Cohen contends. The commentator also reflects on what he sees as a greater betrayal—not just to the Royal Family, but to the British public. “Britons deserve far better than a prince who swaps duty for spectacle and betrays his heritage,” he states.
In his concluding remarks, Cohen does not mince words. “He couldn’t make it as a Royal. Fine. But each disastrous error, each misstep, is a cringeworthy reminder that Hollywood’s sheen cannot replace the greatness of his heritage.” Cohen’s critique paints a picture of a couple navigating fame without the stability or counsel they once had, raising renewed debate about their role, relevance, and responsibilities as royal figures turned celebrities.