In recent controversial remarks, Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) suggested, without evidence, that billionaire philanthropist George Soros financially supports federal judges ruling against President Donald Trump. Boebert made these unsubstantiated accusations during an interview this week with One America News Network (OAN), following a court decision that temporarily halted certain deportations ordered by Trump’s administration.
U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg recently issued a temporary restraining order blocking Trump’s administration from deporting alleged Venezuelan gang members. Boebert, responding to the ruling, criticized federal judges broadly and leveled specific claims regarding their alleged financial backing.
More: Rachel Maddow Warns of ‘Armed Assault’ Amid DOGE-Led Federal Takeover
More: Trump Claims ‘Massive Mandate’ to Reshape America—But Do Voters Agree?
“Well, President Trump is expecting these judges to keep raising up and trying to block the efforts that he’s doing,” Boebert asserted. “In every executive order, they’re trying to find a way to shut anything, any progress that he is making down.” Boebert continued by drawing a contentious analogy and pushing for legislative action against judges she characterized as politically motivated.
“And it’s kind of like whack-a-mole right now, but in the House of Representatives, we need to do our due diligence and impeach these radical Soros-funded judges,” she claimed. “That is our responsibility to the American people and how we uphold the Constitution and truly have a check and balance on the other branches of government.”
Despite the fervor of Boebert’s comments, there is no evidence supporting her allegation that Soros, a frequent target of conservative criticism, funds federal judges in any capacity. Federal judges are appointed by presidents and confirmed by the Senate, receiving their salaries exclusively from federal funding appropriated by Congress.
Critics have swiftly denounced Boebert’s accusations as part of a broader partisan tactic to undermine judicial independence. They warn that promoting such unfounded conspiracy theories threatens the integrity of the judiciary and fuels unnecessary division.
More: Leaked Memo Reveals Trump Admin’s Controversial Plan to Gut Social Security Phone Services
More:Â Trump Weighs Recognizing Crimea as Russian in Bombshell Ukraine Deal Report
The claims made by Boebert arrive amidst a heightened atmosphere of political tension surrounding Trump’s immigration policies and broader debates over judicial authority and independence. The temporary restraining order issued by Judge Boasberg exemplifies judicial oversight as courts grapple with executive decisions.
While Boebert’s accusations resonate within certain conservative circles, independent analysts emphasize the importance of factual discourse, urging political leaders to rely on evidence rather than speculation when engaging with public concerns.
For You:
- Katy Perry recently captured without her engagement ring
- Mike Lindell Defamed Dominion Exec, Now He’s $2.3M Poorer and Facing More Trouble
- Meghan Markle’s latest restock comes after her first batch sold out within 45 minutes in April
- Prince Harry inner sadness is laid bare by an expert
- DHS Denies Racial Profiling Amid Growing Backlash Over Immigration Raids